Abolotio Dieula
Abolotio Mario
Abolotio Régine
Abolotio Suzete
Adolphe Sylvie
Alchita Timoun
Alchita Vagabon
Alchita Vaurien
Alchita yon Kote
Alchita Yves
Alexandre Edith
Alexandre Maude
Alexandre Raphael
Alexandre Yvon
Alexis Myriam
Alexix Sarah
Alexis Willy
Ambroise Mimose
Ambroise Myriam
Ambroise Paul Flavy
Apollon Jean
Apollon Fritz
A pollon Marie Joene
Apollon yvena
Aride Raphael
Armand Edith
Ban nou pastè Abèd
Ban nou pastè Carle
Ban nou pastè Fred
Ban nou pastè Mario
Baptiste nite
Baptiste Edmond
Barack Bijoux
Barack Bonny
Barack Phito
Barthelemy Edna
Barthelemy joseph
Barthelemy Myrta
Baytraka Batfanm
Baytraka Démon
Baytraka Diable
Baytraka Péche
Baytraka Violence
Bellevue fritz
Bellevue Henry
Bellevue Ipromène
Benoit Amos
Benoit Ernice Stacy
Bernard Jean
Bernard Lointain
Bernard Marie Jeannette
Bijou Armelle
Bijou Fanfan
Bijou Maude
Bijou Mireille
Bonhomme gabriel
Bonhomme Hans
Bonhomme Mimose
Bonnet Alice
Bonet André
Bonnet Boniface
Bonnet Dieucile
Bordenave Joseph
Bordenave Josephine
Bordenave Margaret
Bossuet André
Bossuet Frantz
Bossuet Myriam
Bossuet Yvrose
Bourcicot Janvier
Bourcicot Jocelyne
Boussicot Islande
Bourcicot Louis
Bourcicot Rousebert
Bousseau Andréline
Bousseau Fanon
Bousseau Ghislaine
Bresilia Eliphete
Bresilia Enock
Bresilia Vasquez
Brtus Arnold
Brutus Carmen
Camelien Suze
Carasco Danielle
Cardichon Martelle
Carty Rose vonne
Casseus Henry
Casseus Fred
Casseus Joseph
Casseus Nadia
Casseus Nancy
Casseus Nathalie
Casseus Rosanna
Celestin Jude
Celestin Justine
Celestin Marie Joseph P
Celestin Maurice
Celestin Myrta
Cesar Le grand
Cesar Le faux
Cesar Manette
Champagne Alexis
Champagne Alouidor
Champagne Marie Agaie
Chanlate alentine
Charles Martin
Charles Sandra
Charles Rose Marie
Charles soeurette
Chérubin Ciel
Chérubin Sandra
Chery Cocote
Chery Jeanine
Chery Jeannette
Chery Kescia
Chery Mon amour
Clerdonna Agate
Clervot Baudelaire
Clervot Molène B
Collot Marie Marseille
Crazepeyi Bertrand
Crazepeyi Magouyè
Dabel Patricia
Darius Mita
Dera Ketchline
Dérivois Amide
Derivois Emmeline
Derivois Marie Carmelle
Désir Jean
Désir Fritzner
Désir Marie A
Désir Nadège
Désir Sylvie
Désir Margarette V
Desrivières Claude
Dérivières Hans
Dérivières Marie Claude
Desrose Anite
Desrose Hector
Desrose Sonia
Dubois Antonine
Dubois Cajou
Dubois Dor
Dubois Gaillac
Dubois Ruth
Dumersaint Ali
Dumersaint Michelange
Dupiton Lesly
Dupiton Lucien
Dupiton Sylvie
Duplessy Marie Antoine
Duplessy arie Jessie
Dupuy M casse
Dupuy Marie Jessie
Duré Avril
Duré Longtemps
Dué Magdaléna
Duré Mariejo
Duré Marlène
Duvil Alicia
Duvil Anne-Marie
Duvil Bibiane
Edouard Jessy
Estime Marie
Fanor Josette
Fanor Ivyne
Fernézan Marjorie
Fleurinord Jeannide
Francillon Henry
Francillon Lorete
FranÇois élourdes
FranÇois Eudovia
FranÇois Monique
FranÇois Yolette
FranÇois Yolette D
Gabeau Estiverne
Gabeau Eme raldine
Gabeau Géralde
Georgeon Marie Modeleine
Germain Sizelle V
Guillaume uerline
Henry Marie Carmelle
Honoré Chantale
onoré Dalouse
Intatad Moise
Intatad Alphonse
Intatad Patrick
Irandor Marie Elianise
Jabouin Claudette
Jacques Marie Carmelle
Jacquet Destin
Jacquet Edna
Jan l pase l pase
Jan l pase zafè
Jean Alan
Jean Alalavi
Jean Alexandra
Jean Hermite
Jean Lucette
Jean Marie Cécile
Jean Marie U
Jean Baptiste Elsie
Jean Baptiste Gina
Jean Charles Magalie
Jean-gilles Carmelle
Jean jacques Lesly
Jean Jacques Solita
Jean Simon Yolaine
A suivre Musique Militaire
dimanche, mai 11, 2008
vendredi, mai 09, 2008
Une dernière fois ... lis-moi
Hier soir ... bien tard
Après tout ce bruit là
Pendant que sombre je rentrais chez moi
J'ai vu un coeur accosté à la barrière de devant
M'appelant
Oui
Un coeur ...
Son corps battait semblable à un vers gai
Voulant se détacher de son quatrain morose
Un coeur vif
J'ai prié dans mon coeur
Et finalement
Je l'ai épargné
Pour regagner mon lit
Hier soir ... bien tard
Ce matin
Me réveillant très tt
Car je ne pouvais vraiment dormir
Pendant que j'arrosais les fleurs d'à coté
Ce m♪me coeur là
Tout battant encore
Je l'ai vu
Chantant toutes sortes de chants
Délivrant toutes sortes d'évangiles possibles
Pour intégrer mon ♪tre
Et moi
Quoique menacé
A vivre le reste de ma vie bien loin du tien
Je l'ai toisé en vérité
Car mon sang ne marchait pas
Oui !
Un coeur ...
Hier soir ... bien tard
Frantz Le beau
Après tout ce bruit là
Pendant que sombre je rentrais chez moi
J'ai vu un coeur accosté à la barrière de devant
M'appelant
Oui
Un coeur ...
Son corps battait semblable à un vers gai
Voulant se détacher de son quatrain morose
Un coeur vif
J'ai prié dans mon coeur
Et finalement
Je l'ai épargné
Pour regagner mon lit
Hier soir ... bien tard
Ce matin
Me réveillant très tt
Car je ne pouvais vraiment dormir
Pendant que j'arrosais les fleurs d'à coté
Ce m♪me coeur là
Tout battant encore
Je l'ai vu
Chantant toutes sortes de chants
Délivrant toutes sortes d'évangiles possibles
Pour intégrer mon ♪tre
Et moi
Quoique menacé
A vivre le reste de ma vie bien loin du tien
Je l'ai toisé en vérité
Car mon sang ne marchait pas
Oui !
Un coeur ...
Hier soir ... bien tard
Frantz Le beau
mardi, mai 06, 2008
Capital punishment
People are made by the grace of their creator with a lot of things e.i wills that make free to do every things they want and differe them each other. By example I make exercices every day because I want to be strong or to feel good in my body while my neighbor doesn't want it but likes to go to the forest to kill animals. Any way people make their own choice just for them to protect themselves. But the laws are made to punish some behavior the the society judge bad for its well-beings and at the same way condemn the perpetrators of these misbehavior by breaking these laws. These punishments are not appeling vigor because their not in a same proportion. Some of them are called for arson at the same time others are called for murder or terrorist acts. But we are going to talk only about capital punishment.
Generally, philosophers discuss punishment in terme of five elements. For somethings to be punishment, it must 1) pain, 2)be administred for an offense against a law or rule, 3) be administred to someone who has been judge guilty of an offense, 4) be imposed by someone other thean the offender, 5) be imposed by rigthful authority. Whether a punishment is commensurate with an offense, whether it is fair and equitable - these are very important moral and legal questions. But they must be distinguished from the question of what punishment is.
The last four traditional sanctions is the capital punishment, or a sentence of death. A death sentence is, of course, the most extree sentencing option available in the U.S..A today. In 1995, the state of New-York reinstated the death penalty after a thirty-year hiatus, and today thirty-eight states and the federal government make capital punishment and option when serious crimes are committed. Approximately 3,800 deaths row inmates languish in the nation's prisons, while around 100 excutions are carried out yearly. The number of annual excutions has been steadily rising as changes in the law and the recent supreme court decision have facilitated an increasing rate of legal death.
Capital punishment, as a sentencing possibility, was absent fron federal law for a number of years prior to its reestablishment under the 1988 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which included the possibility of capital punishment for drug-related murders. The 1994 Federal Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act dramatically raised the number of crimes punishable by death under federal juridiction to around sisty distinct offenses. Capital punishment can be analyzed from three quite different point of view : 1) a legal perspective, which includes constitutional issues; 2) a philosiphical, moral, and ethical perspective; and 3) via empirical analysis of data on deterrence, public opinion, and so on.
Does the capital punishment succeed in deterring potential murderes ? At first glance, the answer seems to be a resounding yes. After all, virtualy, everyone seems deterred from lwabreaking by relatively mild intimidation - for example, being towed away for illegal parking or losing one's driver's license for recklessness. How much more, common sense suggests, must potential murderers be intimidated by the threat of their own death at the excutioner's hand. In this instance, however, common sense misleads by failing to recognize that murderers differ from the rest of us in important respects.
First, there's the large category of murderers who kill in a fit of rage or passion. A barroom brawl escalates and one mankills another; in a gang fight a member of one group kills a member of another, perhaps to save face or avenge a harm; in a family quarrel a person kills a relative when things get out of hand. The list goes on and on. Such murders, of which are many, are committed not with forethought of the consequences, but in a moment of white-hot anger. Hence not even the death penalty is likely to deter these murderers. Then there's a category of so-called professional criminals, those who deliberately calculate when, where, and how to commit crimes. It's not at all clear that this type of criminal is deterred by the death penalty. In fact, if professional criminala perceive the likely punishment for nonhomicidal crimes as so overly severe, they might be encourage to kill their victim and witnesses rather than risk getting caught: Killing these people greately increases the criminals chances of getting away with their crime, and so they may not in the last be deterred by the threat of the death penalty.
Besides these kinds of potential murderers are those who seemingly have a death wish. The annals of psychiatry are replete with cases of people so emotionally disturbed that they kill in order to win the death penalty to end their tortured existence. In effect, their murderous acts are expressions of suicidal impulses. Since they lack the nerve to kill themselves, they want someone else to do it for them- in this caes, the state.
But, what case of so-called normal, nonsuicidal persons who carefully weight the risks before killing? Are these potential murderers by the death penalty? Even here, the deterrent effect of capital punishment is by no means obvious or certain. What's required is a determination of how many, if any, calculating potential murderers who are not deterred by the threat of life emprisonment would be deterred by the threat of deat. Even if such a determination is possible, it's not obvious or certain that there would be any such people at all, or much more than a small number annually.
A further complication in acessing the death p[enalty as deterrent relates not to factual questions such as the preceding, but to the moral and legal costs of deterrence. Some claim there's a basic incompatibility between the deterrent efficacy of the death penalty and due process, which refers to a constitutionally guaranteed, specific, systematic procedure of appeal. The death penalty can be deterrent, the argument goes, only if due process is sacrified. Conversly, due process can govern the inflicting of capital punishment but at the cost of deterrence. When human life is at issue - as of course it is a capital punishment cases - the courts have been undertandably scrupulous in reviewing cases for error and ensuring that the basic rights have been respected. The consequences of this process of rigorous judicial review are quite apparent: increasing delays of execution, an ever-increasing percentage of those convicted who are never excuted, and large numbers of convictions overtuned.
Some people say that capital punishment is nothing han legalized murder. Whatever crime amab has committed, he's still a human being, and every human life has inherent dignity and worth. We have to protect ourselves from them and we have to send a clear signal to other would-be murderers that society will not tolerate heinous crime. But life imprisonment without possibility of parole is sufficient punishment and deterrent. To strap a fellow human being into a chair and give him a lethal dose of gas, a lethal jolt of electricity, or a lethal injection is unworthy of a civilized society. Capital punishment should have gone the way of legalized torture and mutilition years ago. It, too, is cruel and unusual punishment, and like them it's morally unacceptable in today's world.
"Statistics show two very disturbing facts about the way capital punishment is imposed in our society. First, the poor, the underprileged, and members of minority groups are far more like to be executed than the rich, the influential, and whites. Second, the death penalty is far more like to be imposed when the victim is white than when the victim is a member of a minority group. Regardless of your high-minded principles, capital punishment shows at best a respect for affluent white life, not human life in general. Because its implementation is patently discriminatory and unjust, it must be stopped"
Though the bias mentionned is indeed unjust, it's irrelevant to the morality of capital punishment. After all, the same charges have often been made against our criminal justice systems in general. Of course, such bias shoud be rooted out wherever it exists; and of course, comparable crimes shoud bring the same punishment. But whether capital punishment is justified for the worst of crimes is one issue. Whether it's currently implemented in a justifiable way is another.
" The innocent are often convicted of crimes. As tragic as that is when the sentence is a prison term, the trajedy is far worse when the sentence is death. In the former case society can at least make some reparation for time unjustly served., but no fact is more obvious than the fact that nothing can be done for the dead. To excute even one innocent person is inexcusable, and there's no way in the world that we can rule that possibility out without abolishing the dead penalty"
" I can't deny that the execution of an innocent human being is a terrible tragedy. Nor can I deny that the possibility will always be there. That's why we require such safeguards as the automatic right of appeal after capital convictions. But given these safeguards, the possibility remains extremely slim. And as unfortunately as that slim risk is, like many other unfortunate risk it's one worth taking. The thousands of murders committed in the U.S.A each year require us to take it.
A full study of the cost and benefits involved the practice of capital punishment would not be confined solely to the question of whether it is a better deterrent or preventive of murder than imprisonment. Any thoroughgoing utilitarian approch to the death-penalty controversy would need to examine carefuully other cotts and bene fits as well, because maximizing the balance of all the social benefits over all the social costs is the sole criterion of right and wrong according to utilitarianism. Let us consider, therefore, some of the other costs and bene fits to be calculated. Clinical psychologists have presented evidence to suggest that the death penalty actually incites some persons of unstable mind murder others, either because they are afraid to take their own lives and hope that society will punish them for murder by putting them to death, or because they fancy that they, too, are killing with justification analogously to the lawful and presumably justified killing involved in capital punishment. If such evidence is sound, capital punishment can serve as a counter-preventive or even an incitement to murder; such incited murders become parts of its cost. Imprisonment, however, has not been known to incite any murders or other crimes of violence in a comparable fashion.
In sum, capital punishment, by the way that the state executes it might be scaring people in a certain sense. But leave these so bad crimes and their perpetrators running in the society without strongly be punished can be seen as a true weakness in the judicial field. Society has to play strongly its partition and make criminals out of boring polit people. Any way, there are certain mistakes that they have to be able to solve in the legal field just to reduce the way that innocents might be paying for nothing and be killed for other people.
Generally, philosophers discuss punishment in terme of five elements. For somethings to be punishment, it must 1) pain, 2)be administred for an offense against a law or rule, 3) be administred to someone who has been judge guilty of an offense, 4) be imposed by someone other thean the offender, 5) be imposed by rigthful authority. Whether a punishment is commensurate with an offense, whether it is fair and equitable - these are very important moral and legal questions. But they must be distinguished from the question of what punishment is.
The last four traditional sanctions is the capital punishment, or a sentence of death. A death sentence is, of course, the most extree sentencing option available in the U.S..A today. In 1995, the state of New-York reinstated the death penalty after a thirty-year hiatus, and today thirty-eight states and the federal government make capital punishment and option when serious crimes are committed. Approximately 3,800 deaths row inmates languish in the nation's prisons, while around 100 excutions are carried out yearly. The number of annual excutions has been steadily rising as changes in the law and the recent supreme court decision have facilitated an increasing rate of legal death.
Capital punishment, as a sentencing possibility, was absent fron federal law for a number of years prior to its reestablishment under the 1988 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which included the possibility of capital punishment for drug-related murders. The 1994 Federal Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act dramatically raised the number of crimes punishable by death under federal juridiction to around sisty distinct offenses. Capital punishment can be analyzed from three quite different point of view : 1) a legal perspective, which includes constitutional issues; 2) a philosiphical, moral, and ethical perspective; and 3) via empirical analysis of data on deterrence, public opinion, and so on.
Does the capital punishment succeed in deterring potential murderes ? At first glance, the answer seems to be a resounding yes. After all, virtualy, everyone seems deterred from lwabreaking by relatively mild intimidation - for example, being towed away for illegal parking or losing one's driver's license for recklessness. How much more, common sense suggests, must potential murderers be intimidated by the threat of their own death at the excutioner's hand. In this instance, however, common sense misleads by failing to recognize that murderers differ from the rest of us in important respects.
First, there's the large category of murderers who kill in a fit of rage or passion. A barroom brawl escalates and one mankills another; in a gang fight a member of one group kills a member of another, perhaps to save face or avenge a harm; in a family quarrel a person kills a relative when things get out of hand. The list goes on and on. Such murders, of which are many, are committed not with forethought of the consequences, but in a moment of white-hot anger. Hence not even the death penalty is likely to deter these murderers. Then there's a category of so-called professional criminals, those who deliberately calculate when, where, and how to commit crimes. It's not at all clear that this type of criminal is deterred by the death penalty. In fact, if professional criminala perceive the likely punishment for nonhomicidal crimes as so overly severe, they might be encourage to kill their victim and witnesses rather than risk getting caught: Killing these people greately increases the criminals chances of getting away with their crime, and so they may not in the last be deterred by the threat of the death penalty.
Besides these kinds of potential murderers are those who seemingly have a death wish. The annals of psychiatry are replete with cases of people so emotionally disturbed that they kill in order to win the death penalty to end their tortured existence. In effect, their murderous acts are expressions of suicidal impulses. Since they lack the nerve to kill themselves, they want someone else to do it for them- in this caes, the state.
But, what case of so-called normal, nonsuicidal persons who carefully weight the risks before killing? Are these potential murderers by the death penalty? Even here, the deterrent effect of capital punishment is by no means obvious or certain. What's required is a determination of how many, if any, calculating potential murderers who are not deterred by the threat of life emprisonment would be deterred by the threat of deat. Even if such a determination is possible, it's not obvious or certain that there would be any such people at all, or much more than a small number annually.
A further complication in acessing the death p[enalty as deterrent relates not to factual questions such as the preceding, but to the moral and legal costs of deterrence. Some claim there's a basic incompatibility between the deterrent efficacy of the death penalty and due process, which refers to a constitutionally guaranteed, specific, systematic procedure of appeal. The death penalty can be deterrent, the argument goes, only if due process is sacrified. Conversly, due process can govern the inflicting of capital punishment but at the cost of deterrence. When human life is at issue - as of course it is a capital punishment cases - the courts have been undertandably scrupulous in reviewing cases for error and ensuring that the basic rights have been respected. The consequences of this process of rigorous judicial review are quite apparent: increasing delays of execution, an ever-increasing percentage of those convicted who are never excuted, and large numbers of convictions overtuned.
Some people say that capital punishment is nothing han legalized murder. Whatever crime amab has committed, he's still a human being, and every human life has inherent dignity and worth. We have to protect ourselves from them and we have to send a clear signal to other would-be murderers that society will not tolerate heinous crime. But life imprisonment without possibility of parole is sufficient punishment and deterrent. To strap a fellow human being into a chair and give him a lethal dose of gas, a lethal jolt of electricity, or a lethal injection is unworthy of a civilized society. Capital punishment should have gone the way of legalized torture and mutilition years ago. It, too, is cruel and unusual punishment, and like them it's morally unacceptable in today's world.
"Statistics show two very disturbing facts about the way capital punishment is imposed in our society. First, the poor, the underprileged, and members of minority groups are far more like to be executed than the rich, the influential, and whites. Second, the death penalty is far more like to be imposed when the victim is white than when the victim is a member of a minority group. Regardless of your high-minded principles, capital punishment shows at best a respect for affluent white life, not human life in general. Because its implementation is patently discriminatory and unjust, it must be stopped"
Though the bias mentionned is indeed unjust, it's irrelevant to the morality of capital punishment. After all, the same charges have often been made against our criminal justice systems in general. Of course, such bias shoud be rooted out wherever it exists; and of course, comparable crimes shoud bring the same punishment. But whether capital punishment is justified for the worst of crimes is one issue. Whether it's currently implemented in a justifiable way is another.
" The innocent are often convicted of crimes. As tragic as that is when the sentence is a prison term, the trajedy is far worse when the sentence is death. In the former case society can at least make some reparation for time unjustly served., but no fact is more obvious than the fact that nothing can be done for the dead. To excute even one innocent person is inexcusable, and there's no way in the world that we can rule that possibility out without abolishing the dead penalty"
" I can't deny that the execution of an innocent human being is a terrible tragedy. Nor can I deny that the possibility will always be there. That's why we require such safeguards as the automatic right of appeal after capital convictions. But given these safeguards, the possibility remains extremely slim. And as unfortunately as that slim risk is, like many other unfortunate risk it's one worth taking. The thousands of murders committed in the U.S.A each year require us to take it.
A full study of the cost and benefits involved the practice of capital punishment would not be confined solely to the question of whether it is a better deterrent or preventive of murder than imprisonment. Any thoroughgoing utilitarian approch to the death-penalty controversy would need to examine carefuully other cotts and bene fits as well, because maximizing the balance of all the social benefits over all the social costs is the sole criterion of right and wrong according to utilitarianism. Let us consider, therefore, some of the other costs and bene fits to be calculated. Clinical psychologists have presented evidence to suggest that the death penalty actually incites some persons of unstable mind murder others, either because they are afraid to take their own lives and hope that society will punish them for murder by putting them to death, or because they fancy that they, too, are killing with justification analogously to the lawful and presumably justified killing involved in capital punishment. If such evidence is sound, capital punishment can serve as a counter-preventive or even an incitement to murder; such incited murders become parts of its cost. Imprisonment, however, has not been known to incite any murders or other crimes of violence in a comparable fashion.
In sum, capital punishment, by the way that the state executes it might be scaring people in a certain sense. But leave these so bad crimes and their perpetrators running in the society without strongly be punished can be seen as a true weakness in the judicial field. Society has to play strongly its partition and make criminals out of boring polit people. Any way, there are certain mistakes that they have to be able to solve in the legal field just to reduce the way that innocents might be paying for nothing and be killed for other people.
lundi, avril 28, 2008
ô grand jour !
Comme l'ombre de Saint Benoit
Au coeur de ce grand mois
Tu nous préserves du doute
Pour faire ensemble la route
Toi qui fais donc d'Alex
Semblable à ton annexe
Afin que de ses mots
Elle puisse panser nos maux
J'aimerais bien de mon verbe
Te river un beau gerbe
Toi de qui ... ô grand jour !
Vient ce coeur plein d'amour.
Frantz Le beau
Au coeur de ce grand mois
Tu nous préserves du doute
Pour faire ensemble la route
Toi qui fais donc d'Alex
Semblable à ton annexe
Afin que de ses mots
Elle puisse panser nos maux
J'aimerais bien de mon verbe
Te river un beau gerbe
Toi de qui ... ô grand jour !
Vient ce coeur plein d'amour.
Frantz Le beau
mercredi, mars 26, 2008
Si ...
Si de ta gigantesque source
Ceinturée par ce si beau arc-en-ciel
Je pouvais chaque jour remplir ma cruche d'argile
Qu'est ce qui me manquerait encore
En ce monde où tout est éphémère
Si de ce beau arc-en-ciel aux couleurs certaines
Je pouvais tirer la mienne
Pour déteindre mon coeur
Tout le monde serait mort à mes yeux
Puisque je ne penserais, je verrais,
Je ne vivrais que pour toi
Toi que je porterais en mon coeur
Comme la mère porte avec elle les douleurs de sa couche
Sur la tombe froide de son enfant
Si
En toi
Je pouvais
Vivre grandement
Les délices de mes rêves d'amour
J'irais à minuit
Grimacer ceux-là qui sont morts
Et qui n'ont pas eu cette chance
De goûter le suc de ton grand univers.
Frantz Le beau
Ceinturée par ce si beau arc-en-ciel
Je pouvais chaque jour remplir ma cruche d'argile
Qu'est ce qui me manquerait encore
En ce monde où tout est éphémère
Si de ce beau arc-en-ciel aux couleurs certaines
Je pouvais tirer la mienne
Pour déteindre mon coeur
Tout le monde serait mort à mes yeux
Puisque je ne penserais, je verrais,
Je ne vivrais que pour toi
Toi que je porterais en mon coeur
Comme la mère porte avec elle les douleurs de sa couche
Sur la tombe froide de son enfant
Si
En toi
Je pouvais
Vivre grandement
Les délices de mes rêves d'amour
J'irais à minuit
Grimacer ceux-là qui sont morts
Et qui n'ont pas eu cette chance
De goûter le suc de ton grand univers.
Frantz Le beau
vendredi, mars 21, 2008
Traversée périlleuse
Hier soir
On était une vingtaine
A traverser l'impasse biaisée de la vie
Une vingtaine à peu près
Filles et garÇons confondus
Et
Un vent brusque se déclenchait
Renversant nos corps froids
Basculant toutes nos pensées
Nous virant comme des toupies
Les plantes qu'on croyait fortement robustes
Pliaient en deux comme des enfants pendant la nuit d'hiver
Se tordant sous les tortures d'un drap trop court
Le chapeau que revêtait ma tête
Voltigeait comme une hirondelle
La laissant à la merci d'une pluie qui s'annonÇait timidement
Pendant que grosses pierres roulaient sur le bord de la chaussée
Pour arriver jusque vers nos pieds tremblants
Ce qui aggravait davantage nos peurs
La nuit était dure
Oui
Tout était vraiment sombre comme la mort
Et j'entendais des voix criant à toute allure
Aba ! aba ! aba ! le vent
Pourquoi veux-tu nous tuer tous
Aba ! vautour ... aba !
Mais
Moi qui autrefois
Rejoignait insouciamment leurs voix pour crier plus qu'eux
Quand connaissant que c'est grâce à lui
Que je contemple ce bleu profond de la mer
Ce bleu certain
Puisque sans son agitation
Cette dernière serait couverte de pailles et de corps inanimés
Avec tout le respect qui lui est dû
Je lui ai souri lui disant tendrement
De ma voix douce et souple
Calme-toi ... je t'en prie
Laisse-moi traverser
Mon amour.
Frantz Le beau
On était une vingtaine
A traverser l'impasse biaisée de la vie
Une vingtaine à peu près
Filles et garÇons confondus
Et
Un vent brusque se déclenchait
Renversant nos corps froids
Basculant toutes nos pensées
Nous virant comme des toupies
Les plantes qu'on croyait fortement robustes
Pliaient en deux comme des enfants pendant la nuit d'hiver
Se tordant sous les tortures d'un drap trop court
Le chapeau que revêtait ma tête
Voltigeait comme une hirondelle
La laissant à la merci d'une pluie qui s'annonÇait timidement
Pendant que grosses pierres roulaient sur le bord de la chaussée
Pour arriver jusque vers nos pieds tremblants
Ce qui aggravait davantage nos peurs
La nuit était dure
Oui
Tout était vraiment sombre comme la mort
Et j'entendais des voix criant à toute allure
Aba ! aba ! aba ! le vent
Pourquoi veux-tu nous tuer tous
Aba ! vautour ... aba !
Mais
Moi qui autrefois
Rejoignait insouciamment leurs voix pour crier plus qu'eux
Quand connaissant que c'est grâce à lui
Que je contemple ce bleu profond de la mer
Ce bleu certain
Puisque sans son agitation
Cette dernière serait couverte de pailles et de corps inanimés
Avec tout le respect qui lui est dû
Je lui ai souri lui disant tendrement
De ma voix douce et souple
Calme-toi ... je t'en prie
Laisse-moi traverser
Mon amour.
Frantz Le beau
" Je t'aime "
En guise de l'or
D'opium
De discours sans fin
En guise de tout ...
Je te dis ce petit mot
Tout court
Tout simple
Frêle !
Tout apostrophé
Ce mot ...
Bref ... comme le temps
Celui-là qui congédiant le doute
Déclenche l'engin d'amour
Pour aboutir à la vie pleine et entière
A l'infini aux écorchures vivables
Au coeur
Je t'aime
En guise de tout
Je te le dis ... mon amour
Dans l'espoir qu'il saura
De son sel vivifiant
Te garder intacte
Vive
Et toi, et ta beauté, et tes gestes
Te perpétuer même après le mot-fiel-froid de la mort
ô même pendant que ton corps
Laisse l'enceinte de la cathédrale
Et que hurle bien fort le carillon
Oui
De sa mystique pure et rassurante
Il te ramènera au coeur même de ton sourire parfait
De tes cillements précieux
De tes courbes taquinantes
Car fait pour rendre à la reine
Ce qui lui est dû
Sa paix méritée
Sa joie intégrale
Son hymne
Et
Comme les eaux se compilent
Dans leur divine sagesse
Pour se retrouver dans le ventre large de la mer
Ainsi
D'un coeur rempli d'amour
D'un être ... enfin !
Je te le dis ... ô poétesse !
Afin que
Vie
Soit
En toi
D'éternité en éternité
Frantz Le beau
D'opium
De discours sans fin
En guise de tout ...
Je te dis ce petit mot
Tout court
Tout simple
Frêle !
Tout apostrophé
Ce mot ...
Bref ... comme le temps
Celui-là qui congédiant le doute
Déclenche l'engin d'amour
Pour aboutir à la vie pleine et entière
A l'infini aux écorchures vivables
Au coeur
Je t'aime
En guise de tout
Je te le dis ... mon amour
Dans l'espoir qu'il saura
De son sel vivifiant
Te garder intacte
Vive
Et toi, et ta beauté, et tes gestes
Te perpétuer même après le mot-fiel-froid de la mort
ô même pendant que ton corps
Laisse l'enceinte de la cathédrale
Et que hurle bien fort le carillon
Oui
De sa mystique pure et rassurante
Il te ramènera au coeur même de ton sourire parfait
De tes cillements précieux
De tes courbes taquinantes
Car fait pour rendre à la reine
Ce qui lui est dû
Sa paix méritée
Sa joie intégrale
Son hymne
Et
Comme les eaux se compilent
Dans leur divine sagesse
Pour se retrouver dans le ventre large de la mer
Ainsi
D'un coeur rempli d'amour
D'un être ... enfin !
Je te le dis ... ô poétesse !
Afin que
Vie
Soit
En toi
D'éternité en éternité
Frantz Le beau
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)
